What does your salary package leave in your pocket?

One name, two different sums

Salary sacrifice, salary packaging, total remuneration packaging. Three names, one idea, and nothing turns on which one your employer prints on the form. What the single name hides is that underneath it there are two arrangements, and they share almost nothing except the moment they happen: before tax is worked out.

One sends money to your super fund. The other buys things you would otherwise pay for from your take-home pay. Different rules, different limits, and a different party carrying the tax. Most confusion about packaging is really confusion about which of the two someone is talking about.

The first branch has a yearly allowance you can pass

Everything entering your super before tax shares one yearly allowance, and the calculator counts against it as you type. That is the whole of the first branch: one destination, one allowance, open to anyone whose employer runs payroll.

Passing the allowance does not stop you. The screen marks the point rather than refusing the number, because the point is where the concession ends, not where the arrangement becomes impossible. That distinction matters when you are deciding how much to put in: you are not looking for a barrier, you are looking for where the reason to do it runs out. Where that money goes afterwards, and what it costs to have it sitting out of reach until retirement, belongs to the guide to the July 2026 super changes.

The second branch is not yours to open

Take a benefit instead of salary and someone still owes tax on it. As a rule that someone is your employer, which is why most employers simply do not offer this branch. The exception is written into the law for a particular set of workplaces, and if yours is one of them, a slice of ordinary living costs can be paid from pre-tax salary.

So this branch turns on a question no other input on this screen asks. Everywhere else the calculator wants a number about you. Here it wants to know who employs you, and your own figures cannot answer that. Some employers also hand the arrangement to a provider to run. Which workplaces qualify, and what the cap counts, is set out in the salary packaging guide.

Two ceilings that never meet

Both branches have a yearly limit. The limits sound alike, sit in the same order of size, and are described with the same word, which is exactly why people reach for one figure and try to fit both branches inside it. They are separate schemes. Filling one to the top leaves the other untouched, and running out of room in one tells you nothing about the other.

There is a second trap inside the second limit. It is written on a grossed up basis, meaning the figure is scaled to what the benefit would have cost before tax rather than what you would hand over at the shop. The number you can actually spend is smaller, and that is why the screen shows the two versions side by side instead of printing one and hoping you know which it is.

The question to ask before the one about amounts

For most people only the first branch exists. That makes the opening move a question about your employer rather than about money: which branch is open to you at all. Nothing on this screen can answer it, and everything on this screen depends on it.

And you can safely ignore anything that treats the three names as three products. They are one idea wearing different labels, and an article that spends its length telling them apart has not got to the part that changes your answer.

Open the pay calculator